Dear visitor, it would appear you are using Internet Explorer 6 as a browser. Unfortunately Hardware.Info is rendered less than completely accurately in this by now obsolete browser. For an optimal experience of our site, we recommend you use an up-to-date version of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Opera.

Comparing Performance and Power Use For Vista vs. Windows 7 WIth Clarksfield Chip

hwi-h  News » External news » Slashdot » Comparing Performance and Power Use For Vista vs. Windows 7 WIth Clarksfield Chip

External news

Comparing Performance and Power Use For Vista vs. Windows 7 WIth Clarksfield Chip

Slashdot

Site: Slashdot

Publication date: 10/14/2009 5:01 PM

crazipper writes "Back when Intel launched its Core i5/i7 'Lynnfield' CPUs, Tom's Hardware ran some tests in Windows 7 versus Vista to gauge the benefits of the core parking and ideal core optimizations, said to cut power consumption in the new OS. It turned out that Win7 shifted the Nehalem-based CPUs in and out of Turbo Boost mode faster, resulting in higher power draw under load, while idle power was a slight bit lower. The mobile version of the architecture was claimed (at the time) to show a greater improvement in moving to Win7. Today there's a follow-up with the flagship Clarksfield processor that shows the same aggressive P-state promotion policies giving Win7 a significant performance advantage with Core i7 Mobile. However, power consumption is higher as well."Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read more...

Advertisement

No comments.

Hardware.Info in other countries: België - Nederland - United Kingdom - United States